Wednesday, December 1, 2010

The Heart Essence Of Buddhist Meditation

From Tricycle:

Home › Magazine › Winter 2007 › The Heart-Essence of Buddhist Meditationdharma talk


The Heart-Essence of Buddhist Meditation

The common roots of various Buddhist meditative practices. Artwork by Mia Muratori



Lama Surya Das

6 Twitter 76 Facebook 0 Email Clinging to one’s school and condemning others



Is the certain way to waste one’s learning.

Since all dharma teachings are good,

Those who cling to sectarianism

Degrade Buddhism and sever

Themselves from liberation.



—Milarepa, The One Hundred Thousand Songs



During my initial private meeting with the Venerable Kalu Rinpoche, my first root guru, I asked him about the main points of meditation. He asked what kind of meditation I was doing, and I told him mindfulness of breathing. “What will you concentrate on when you stop breathing?” he asked.



That was a real eye-opener. Suddenly I realized that I might have to broaden the scope of my understanding of Buddhist practice. In time, I came to discover that it included a great deal more than any one meditation technique and also that the many forms of Buddhist meditation shared fundamental elements.



Lama Surya DasThe philosopher Simone Weil characterized prayer as pure undivided attention. Here is where all contemplative practices have a common root, a vital heart that can be developed in an almost infinite variety of skillful directions, depending on purpose and perspective. Different techniques of meditation can be classified according to their focus. Some focus on the field of perception itself, and we call those methods mindfulness; others focus on a specific object, and we call those concentrative practices. There are also techniques that shift back and forth between the field and the object.



Meditation, simply defined, is a way of being aware. It is the happy marriage of doing and being. It lifts the fog of our ordinary lives to reveal what is hidden; it loosens the knot of self-centeredness and opens the heart; it moves us beyond mere concepts to allow for a direct experience of reality. Meditation embodies the way of awakening: both the path and its fruition. From one point of view, it is the means to awakening; from another, it is awakening itself.



Meditation masters teach us how to be precisely present and focused on this one breath, the only breath; this moment, the only moment. In the Dzogchen tradition we refer to a “fourth time,” the transcendent moment of nowness. In Tibetan this is called shicha, a transcendent yet immanent dimension of timeless being that vertically intersects each moment of horizontal linear time—past, present, and future. Whether we’re aware of it or not, we are quite naturally present to this moment—where else could we be? Meditation is simply a way of knowing this.



Different Buddhist schools recommend a variety of meditative postures. Some emphasize a still, formal posture, while others are less strict and more focused on internal movements of consciousness. Tibetan traditions, for instance, advise an upright spine, erect but relaxed; hands at rest in the lap, with the belly soft; shoulders relaxed, chin slightly tucked, and the gaze lowered with eyelids half shut; the jaw is slack with the tongue behind the upper teeth; the legs are crossed. A Soto Zen Buddhist saying instructs us to sit with formal body and informal mind. The common essential point is to remain balanced and alert, so as to pierce the veil of samsaric illusion.



Although most Westerners tend to conceive of Eastern forms of meditation as something done cross-legged with eyes closed, in a quiet, unlit place, the Buddha points with equal emphasis to four postures in which to meditate: sitting, standing, walking, and lying down. The Satipatthana Sutra says: “When you sit, know that you are sitting; when standing, know you are standing. . . .” This pretty much covers all our activities, allowing us to integrate meditative practice into daily life. Learn to sit like a Buddha, stand like a Buddha, walk like a Buddha. Be a Buddha; this is the main point of Buddhist practice.



While many people today practice meditation for physical and mental health, a deeper approach to practice energizes our inner life and opens the door to realization. In Tibetan, the word for meditation is gom, which literally means “familiarization” or “getting used to,” and in this sense meditation is a means by which we familiarize ourselves with our mind. The common Pali term for meditation is bhavana, meaning “to cultivate, to develop, to bring into being.” So we might then think of meditation as the active cultivation of mind leading to clear awareness, tranquility, and wisdom. This requires conscious effort.



But from another—and at first glance contradictory—perspective, there is nothing to do in meditation but enjoy the view: the magical, mysterious, and lawful unfolding of all that is, all of which is perfect as it is. In other words, we’re perfect as we are, and yet there’s work to be done. In this we find the union of being and doing: we swoop down with the bigger picture in mind—the view of absolute reality—and at the same time we climb the spiritual mountain in keeping with our specific aspirations and inclinations, living out relative truth. “While my view is as high as the sky, my actions regarding cause and effect [karma] are as meticulous as finely ground barley flour,” sang the Lotus Master Padmasambhava, who first brought Buddhism to Tibet in the eighth century. By alternating between active cultivation and effortless awareness, we engage in a delicate dance that balances disciplined intention with simply being. By being both directive and allowing, we gradually learn to fearlessly explore the frontiers and depths of doing and being, and come to realize that whatever is taking place, whatever we may feel and experience, is intimately connected with and inseparable from intrinsic awareness.

“Not doing, not constructing, not fabricating, not altering or manipulating your mind, while remaining undistracted: this is my vital pithy instruction, the heart-essence of meditation.” So taught my own Dzogchen master Nyoshul Khenpo Rinpoche. “Beyond action and inaction, the sublime dharma is accomplished.”




Meditation is not about getting away from it all, numbing out, or stopping thoughts. Without trying to be rid of pesky thoughts and feelings, we learn how to practice being aware of them in the fleeting immediacy of the very moment in which they present themselves. We can cultivate awareness of any object: sounds, smells, physical sensations, perceptions, and so forth. Everything is grist for the mill—even those things we find terribly unpleasant. As the Tibetan Dragon Master Gyalwang Drukpa says, “Everything must be meditated!”



Like the archer straightening his arrow and perfecting his aim, the practitioner of meditation straightens out the mind while aiming his or her attentional energy at its object. Learning to drop what we’re doing, however momentarily, and to genuinely pay attention in the present moment, without attachment or bias, helps us become clear, just as a snow globe becomes clear when we stop shaking it and its flakes settle.



This settling process of concentrated attention has four stages: first, the letting go of distracting inner objects—such as feelings, thoughts, attractions, and aversions—and all outer objects; second, the attainment of serene one-pointedness of focus; third, the refinement of this state of concentration into a subtler and purer awareness. The fourth and final stage is the attainment of a state of simple wakefulness and equanimity conducive to clear vision and profound comprehension, an awareness beyond subject and object.



Let’s take an example: In breath-awareness meditation—the technique known as mindfulness of breathing (anapanasati in Pali)—we first observe the breath by intently following the tiny movements and physical sensations associated with each in- and out-breath. When we are distracted, we simply bring the wandering mind back to the object of attention. (In this case it is the breath, but whatever the particular practice—mantra, visualization, and so forth—the principle is the same.) Then, gradually relaxing into the object, we notice the gentle tide of thoughts and feelings subside as we fine-tune our focus. Later, as our awareness deepens, we abandon any dualistic notion of inner and outer as we become the breath itself. This calls to mind the haiku master Basho’s saying that in order to write about a tree, he would watch the tree until he became the tree. We watch the breath until we become the breath. In this way, as it is said in Zen, we come to know the breath, ourselves, and all things intimately. In the beginning, concentration is key. Concentrative meditations (Sanskrit shamatha) are said to be the useful means but not the end. The stability of mind established by shamatha becomes the foundation for insight meditation, or vipassana, in which the critical faculties of mind discern the nature of samsara: impermanent, without self, and ultimately unsatisfactory.



There are many techniques for developing concentration and insight, but the point is to not be caught up in and overly influenced by the ever-running narratives and desires of the mind. All center on the vital principles of nonjudgmental openness and relaxation with applied and discerning awareness. As practice matures, effortless, innate wakefulness is balanced by the discipline of mindfulness. What we call “mindfulness meditation” can be broadly defined as any conscious activity that keeps the cling-free attention anchored in the present moment, allowing us to see clearly what is happening, to distinguish what is wholesome from what is unwholesome, and to perceive the interdependent working of things. In the Satipatthana Sutra the Buddha identified four basic foundations of mindfulness: the body, feelings (in the sense that all sense impressions feel pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral), mind states and mental objects, and universal laws (dharmas). Paying careful attention to these aspects of ourselves brings self-knowledge and wisdom.



Mindfulness is the tool we use to bring the mind back home, to the present moment, to what is, just as it is, and to who and what we actually are. Through mindfulness we learn how not to be so distracted by thoughts, feelings, memories—our running inner narrative. That’s why buddhas are called jinas, “conquerors”: they have conquered their afflictive states of hatred, greed, and delusion, all of which obscure and diminish our innate Buddha-nature.



Mindful awareness frees us from habitual patterns, opening up a space between stimulus and response, allowing us to consciously choose how to respond to things rather than blindly react. With the discernment of mindfulness we no longer fall prey to karmic habits and unwholesome conditioning. As the pioneering Zen master Shunryu Suzuki said, “We pay attention with respect and interest, not in order to manipulate but to understand what is true. And seeing what is true, the heart becomes free.”



This is not just Buddhist double-talk. In the Diamond Sutra the Buddha says of his enlightenment that he has obtained nothing that wasn’t in him all along, there for the finding. And the Hevajra Tantra teaches, “We are all buddhas by nature; it is only adventitious obscurations which temporarily veil it from us.”



There are various Buddhist schools with different approaches and practices, but committed meditation practice is, in short, the way we apply the Buddha’s final words: “Work out your own salvation with diligence.”



In Tibetan Buddhism it is said that detachment is the root of meditation and devotion is its head. Bodhicitta (the aspiration to attain enlightenment for the welfare of others) is its soul. Mindfulness is its breath, vigilence its skin, and nondistraction its essence. Balance and harmony are the seat of meditation, and penetrating wisdom is its eye. Nowness is the time, and this place is the place. Self-discipline is the very bones of Buddha, and present-moment awareness is the heart of it all.



Milarepa said, “The ultimate view is to observe one’s mind, steadfastly and with determination.” When the Buddha stated, over twenty-five hundred years ago, that anyone could become enlightened through applying his teachings, he meant it. And many have reaped those blessed results. This is the promise of Buddha-dharma, of the wisdom of meditation. ▼



Lama Surya Das is a teacher in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and founder of the Dzogchen Center. His new books are The Big Questions and Buddha Is As Buddha Does.



Guided Meditation: Simply Being




Sit comfortably, perhaps close your eyes, or lower your gaze. Take a deep breath or two and relax. Breathe slowly and let it all go. Release the tension and relax a little more.



Stop doing and settle back into just being. Let things settle without your direction or intercession. Let go. Wherever things fall is okay for now. Open to the wisdom of allowing, of inclusive acceptance. This is the inner secret to natural meditation.



Don’t get lost. Stay right here, at home and at ease. Befriend yourself; familiarize yourself with your own fundamental presence. Let awareness be uninterrupted by techniques or concepts.



If and when you feel lost, distracted, spaced out, or sleepy, get in touch with your breath. Watch the breath, observe the inhalation and exhalation as they effortlessly occur. Feel the breath moving in and out, anchoring you in the present moment while you again let everything go, without judgment, evaluation, or interference.



Opening gradually to the effortlessness of pure presence, turn your attention inward. All we seek can be found within. This is the process and practice of inner freedom.



Being Buddha, enjoy the buoyant peace, harmony, and delight of natural meditation.



Images: © Mia Muratori

Chanukah & Christmas; When Hope Triumphs Over Cynical Realism

From Tikkun:

Chanukah & Christmas: When Hope Triumphs Over Cynical Realism (updated to December, 2010)


By Rabbi Michael Lerner



Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself supposed to bring liberation, Chanukah is about a national liberation struggle involving an entire people who seek to remake the world through struggle with an oppressive political and social order: the Greek conquerors (who ruled Judea from the time of Alexander in 325 B.C.E.) and the Hellenistic culture that they sought to impose.



Though the holiday celebrated by lighting candles for 8 nights (first night in 2010: Dec. 3) recalls the victory of the guerrilla struggle led by the Maccabees against the Syrian branch of the Greek empire, and the subsequent rededication (Chanukah in Hebrew) of the Temple in Jerusalem in 165 B.C.E., there was a more difficult struggle which took place (and in some dimensions still rages) within the Jewish people between those who hoped for a triumph of a spiritual vision of the world embedded (as it turned out, quite imperfectly) in the Maccabees and a cynical realism that had become the common sense of the merchants and priests who dominated the more cosmopolitan arena of Jerusalem.



The cynical realists in Judea, among them many of the priests charged with preserving the Temple, argued that Greek power was overwhelming and that it made far greater sense to accommodate to it than to resist. The Greek globalizers promised advances in science and technology that could benefit international trade and enrich the local merchants who sided with them, even though the taxes that accompanied their rule impoverished the Jewish peasants who worked the land and eked out a subsistence living. Along with Greek science and military prowess came a whole culture that celebrated beauty both in art and in the human body, presented the world with the triumph of rational thought in the works of Plato and Aristotle, and rejoiced in the complexities of life presented in the theatre of Aeschylus, Euripides, and Aristophanes.



To the Maccabees, the guerrilla band that they assembled to fight the Greek Empire and its Seleucid dynasty in Syria, and to many of the Jewish supporters of that struggle, the issue of Greek militarism, social injustice and oppression were far more salient than the accomplishments of Greek high culture. Whatever might be the value of Athenian democracy, the reality that it exported to the world through Alexander and his successors was oppressive and exploitative.





The "old-time religion" that the Maccabbees fought to preserve had revolutionary elements in it that went far beyond the Greeks in articulating a liberatory vision: not only in the somewhat abstract demand to "love your neighbor as yourself," "love the stranger," and pursue justice and peace, but also concretely in Torah prescriptions to abolish all debts every seven years, allow the land to lie fallow every seven years, refrain from all work and activities connected to control over the earth once a week on Sabbath, redistribute the land every fifty years (the Jubilee) back to its original equal distribution.



The identification with the oppressed, enshrined in Judaism in its insistence that Jews were derived from slaves who had been liberated, and in its focus on retelling the story of being oppressed that was central to the Torah, seemed atavistic and naïve to the more educated and enlightened Jewish urban dwellers, who pointed to the reactionary tribal elements of Torah and sided with the Greeks when they declared circumcision and study of Torah illegal and banned the observance of the Sabbath.



The miracle of Chanukah is that so many people were able to resist the overwhelming "reality" imposed by the imperialists and to stay loyal to a vision of a world based on generosity, love of stranger, and loyalty to an invisible God who promised that life could be based on justice and peace. It was these "little guys," the powerless, who sustained a vision of hope that inspired them to fight against overwhelming odds, against the power of technology and science organized in the service of domination, and despite the fact that they were dismissed as terrorists and fundamentalist crazies. When this kind of energy, what religious people call "the Spirit of God," becomes ingredient in the consciousness of ordinary people, miracles ensue.



It is this same radical hope, whether rooted in religion or secularist belief systems, that remains the foundation for all who continue to struggle for a world of peace and social justice at a time when the champions of war and injustice dominate the political and economic institutions of our own society, often with the assistance of their contemporary cheerleading religious leaders. It is that radical hope that is celebrated this Chanukah by those Jews who have not yet joined the contemporary Hellenists.



Radical hope is also the message of Christmas. Like Chanukah, it is rooted in the ancient tradition of a winter solstice celebration to affirm humanity's belief that the days, now grown shortest around December 23rd, will grow long again as the sun returns to heat the earth and nourish the plants. Just as Jews light holiday lights at this time of year, so Christians transform the dark into a holiday of lights, with beautiful Christmas trees adorned with candles or electric lights, and lights on the outside and inside of their homes.



Christianity took the hope of the ancients and transformed it into a hope for the transformation of a world of oppression. The birth of a newborn, always a signal of hope for the family in which it was born, was transformed into the birth of the messiah who would come to challenge existing systems of economic and political oppression, and bring a new era of peace on earth, social justice and love. Symbolizing that in the baby Jesus was a beautiful way to celebrate and reaffirm hope in the social darkness that has been imposed on the world by the Roman empire, and all its successors right up through the contemporary dominance of a globalized rule of corporate and media forces that have permeated every corner of the planet with their ethos of selfishness and materialism.



Seeing Jesus as the Son of God, and as an intrinsic part of God, was also a way of giving radical substance to the notion that every human being is created in the image of God. For God to come on earth, bring a holy message of love and salvation, and then to die at the hands of the imperialists and be resurrected to come back at some future date was and is a beautiful message of hope for a world not yet redeemed, and became an inspiration to hundreds of millions who saw in it the comforting message that the rule of the powerful was not the ultimate reality of existence. And yet, using the specificity of one human being and identifying him as God, a move made by St. Paul but not by Jesus himself, did not fit into the framework of Judaism, which could not accept Jesus as messiah either because of its view that the messiah would bring an end to wars and all forms of oppression, an end that had not yet taken place during or after Jesus' death.



Jews and Christians have much in common in celebrating at this time of year. We certainly want to use this holiday season to once again affirm our commitment to end the war in Iraq, to end global poverty and hunger by embracing the Network of Spiritual Progressives' version of the Global Marshall Plan, to reduce carbon emissions and population growth and to save the world from ecological destruction. We live in dark times--but these holidays help us reaffirm our hope for a fundamentally different reality that we can help bring about in the coming years. And that despite the fact that we must acknowledge that the Chanukah revolution led to the rule of the Jewish Hashmona-im whose rule devolved into tyranny and self-destructiveness, and that the beauty vision of early Christianity devolved into the tyranny and anti-Semitism of Constantinian forms of the merger of religion with state power.



There are reasons to not mush together these separate holidays. The tremendous pressure of the capitalist marketplace has been to take these holidays, eliminate their actual revolutionary messages, and instead turn them into a secular focus whose only command is "Be Happy and Buy." One might have imagined that the current economic meltdown would significantly modify these messages, but that has not yet happened in December, 2010.



The huge pressure to be happy and the media's ability to portray others as beaming with joy makes a huge number of people despondent because they actually don't feel that kind of joy, and imagine that they are the only ones who don't, and hence feel terrible about themselves, something they seek to repair by buying, drugging or drinking themselves into happiness. And when that too doesn't work for very long, they become all the more unhappy with themselves or with others.



The pressure to buy as a way of showing that you really care about others puts many people into the position of spending more than they have, putting themselves into further debt, and then feeling depressed about that. Still others have no way to buy "enough" on credit, and then their children, saturated by a media specially attuned to the best ways to market to toddlers and everyone older through their teen years, make their parents or others feel inadequate because they have not bought what the media portrays as the standard for what a "normal family" buys for the holidays. Jews, seeking to fit into American society, grabbed onto this path of the holidays "not really being religious but only a time to celebrate," and thus many embraced Christmas in the one way they could-buying presents for their non-Jewish friends and neighbors and celebrating Christmas as a "non-sectarian, American holiday." But this well-intentioned move to fit into American society only helped the capitalist secularists, and unintentionally further undermined the ability of Christians to hold on to the religious and spiritual intent of their holiday. This is why spiritual progressives of the Christian faith have urged Tikkun and the Network of Spiritual Progressives to NOT celebrate the holiday as one undifferentiated "holiday season" but to celebrate them as religious and spiritual holidays and to affirm the specific religious message of each one depending on which fits your particular faith.



Yet we also want to affirm the goodness in what secularists have tried to do with these holidays in removing them from their religious specificity. There has been far too much anger and killing in the name of religions in the history of humanity. We at the Network of Spiritual Progressives do not believe that most of that killing was actually motivated by religious differences so much as by power struggles that were given religious justifications and appearances. And we are all too well aware that in the 20th century over a 150 million people were slaughtered in the name of secular belief systems and secular powers (1st WW, 2nd WW, Korean War, Vietnam War, Stalinist gulag, Maoist gulag, colonial and anti-colonial wars, etc.), so we are not going to buy any notion that says that eliminating religion will increase world peace (though we wouldn't shed any tears if the fundamentalist and ultra-nationalist forms of religion disappeared into the dustbins of history).



Many of those who have sought to secularize the holiday season do so from the fear that without that kind of secularization, it will be harder for people to express caring and mutual support if they have to do so through the frameworks of religions of which they are not apart. Certainly, when it comes to interfaith marriages and families, the need for this kind of smooth path to affirming both traditions is really much needed. And yet, as a Jew, I want to recognize the particular importance to Christians of having Christmas be about Christ, not about gifts and drinking and merry making but about the meaning of the Christ for Christian belief. In this respect, there is a fundamental asymmetry here. Christmas and Easter are the main Christian holidays, while Chanukah is only a minor holiday that has become major only because some (mostly assimilating) Jews in the West felt the need to provide their children with something that could compensate them for not having Christmas with its attractive glitz and lights and toys. But our major holidays are Rosh Hashanah/Yom Kippur and Passover (and of course, weekly Shabbat), and so when Chanukah gets secularized we Jews don't lose as much as Christians do when Christmas is secularized.



As we enter this holiday season, let us stay conscious on all these levels, resist the allure and the seductive charm of the capitalist marketplace and its capacity to reduce all reality and all loving to the consumption of "things," and instead return to the deep spiritual messages of our own traditions, while lovingly supporting each other to stay true to our own deepest truths.



The ambiguities of hope were well illustrated in the past two years by the Obama Administration. Brought to power by a movement that believed we had elected a president committed to peace, social justice, human rights, and environmental sanity, the Obama Administration quickly pulled away from its progressive base and became, on many (NOT ALL) issues, hard to distinguish from many presidential administrations that came before. Tied to serving the interests of Wall Street and the elites of wealth and power, unwilling to articulate a progressive worldview that could contend against the selfishness and materialism and fear of the other which has always been the central psychological core of global capitalism, self-disempowering so that it would not fight even for the ideals it was willing to articulate, fearful to challenge the war-makers who run the military-industrial complex, enamored of the idea of compromise to his Right but not to his Left, Obama has turned many previously hopeful people into cynical or apathetic citizens, in the process generating emotional and spiritual depression, despair and humiliation among those who had momentarily overcome their doubts and recommitted themselves to engaging in social change work. In that respect, Obama may have done more to weaken the forces of hope than even right-wingers might have been able to accomplish.



The victory of the Maccabbees and the triumph of Christianity in the Roman Empire starting with Constantine may have had the same kind of impact as Obama. The Maccabbees were in some respects like the Taliban--completely ruthless in their religious fanaticism, willing to impose it by force on fellow Jews, and their Hashmonaen kindgom that they created became as corrupt as the Hellenists they replaced. The Christianity imposed on Europe through force with its hateful anti-Semitism, misogyny and ruthless determination to burn as witches or torture those who would not accept its rule, played a major role in discrediting the love-oriented message of the Jewish prophet and wisdom teacher Jesus of Nazareth. So there is a certain downside to these victories that is necessary to acknowledge and talk about on these holidays.



But history is always ambiguous, because we ourselves as human beings have not yet evolved to the point where we fully embody our highest ideals. It makes sense to celebrate these holdiays even so, and to allow ourselves to rejoice in the partial victories that humans have achieved through our history, even as we reaffirm the need to go much further than the consciousness that has surrounded these holidays in the past or among some of our co-religionists in the present (including for Jews the way that Chanukah is now appropriated into the right-wing versions of Zionism in Israel).But lets not forget: It was Christian ideals that led Americans to embrace the civil rights movement, and it was the preservation of Jewish consciousness by the victory of the Maccabbees that made possible the Jewish contribution to subsequent history and culture, philosophy and social theory, not to mention involvement in shaping revolutionary and utopian thinking and practice.



So the limitations of Judaism and Christianity should not overshadow the valuable contributions that some aspects of these religions still inspire.



For Jews celebrating Chanukah as a wonderful moment of national liberation, we must not put out of our minds the national liberation still being struggle for by the Palestinian people, but instead use this holiday to commit to supporting them while protecting Israel as well. Christians who, had they voted like Jews in the 2010 midterm elections (68% of whom voted for the more liberal candidates in US Congressional elections), would have given us a Congress with a strong liberal bent, might use this Christmas to popularize in their families, neighbors, friends and churches the Network of Spiritual Progressives' campaign for a Global Marshall Plan (www.spiritualprogressives.org/GMP) and our call for an ESRA--Environmental and Social Responsibility Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (www.spiritualprogressives.org/ESRA). Both communities might use the holiday season to combat growing Islamophobia in the US and challenge those who are showing a willingness to let the Right set the public agenda in the coming years. And both might rejoice in each other's particularity, while maintaining their own traditions in a joyful and generous spirt.



If you happen to be in the SF Bay Area on Dec. 5th, you are invited to our Chanukah party (at the First Congregational Church of Berkeley, Friday night, Dec. 5, 7 p.m. (but give yourself 15 minutes to park), NW corner of Channing and Dana. Candle-lighting at 7:20 p.m. Dancing to the music of Achi Ben Shalom, Jan Padover, and Julie Walcer, plus latkes and sour cream and other yummies!!!! Entrance fee: $15-$25 sliding fee scale depending on ability to pay to help us defray the cost of the evening. Followed at 8:45 p.m. with our innovative but traditional also Shabbat service.





Chag urim sameyach-happy holiday of lights.

Chag Chanukah sameyach-happy Chanukah.

Merry Christmas.

Happy Kwanza.

Mubarack Eid.





Many blessings to you!

Rabbi Michael Lerner

Editor, Tikkun www.tikkun.org

Chair, (with Sister Joan Chittister and Princeton U. Professor Cornel West) The Network of Spiritual Progressives www.spiritualprogressives.org

Rabbi of Beyt Tikkun Synagogue in Berkeley, California 510 644 1200

RabbiLerner@Tikkun.org

Renunciation

From Tricycle:

Home › Magazine › Fall 1991 › Renunciationdharma talk


Renunciation

Like a Raven in the Wind



Pema Chodron

Pema Chödrön is an American nun in the Kagyu lineage of Tibetan Buddhism, and the director of Gampo Abbey, on Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, the first monastery in the Tibetan Vajrayana tradition in North America. After practicing for almost twenty years, she now represents one of the most respected examples of the transmission of Buddhist teachings to American disciples. Born Dierdre Blomfield-Brown, Pema graduated from the elite Miss Porter's school and then attended Sarah Lawrence College and the University of California at Berkeley. At 21, she married and had two children. After a painful second divorce in 1972, she began looking for spiritual guidance, and soon became the student of the late Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche. In 1974, she received the nun's novice ordination from His Holiness Cyalwa Karmapa and, at his request, took the full nun's ordination in Hong Kong in 1981. Like a Raven in the Wind was adapted from a talk given during a one-month practice period. A collection of Pema Chodron's talks, The Wisdom of No Escape, will be published this fall by Shambhala Publications.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WHEN PEOPLE TAKE REFUGE in the formal ceremony of becoming a Buddhist, they receive a name that indicates how they should work. I've noticed that when people get the name "Renunciation," they hate it. It makes them feel terrible; they feel as if someone gave them the name "Torture Chamber," or perhaps "Torture Chamber of Enlightenment." People usually don't like the name "Discipline" either, but so much depends on how you look at these things. Renunciation does not have to be regarded as negative. I was taught that it has to do with letting go of holding back. What one is renouncing is closing down and shutting off from life. You could say that renunciation is the same thing as opening to the teachings of the present moment.



It's probably good to think of the ground of renunciation as being our good old selves, our basic decency and sense of humor. In Buddhist teachings, as well as in the teachings of many other contemplative or mystical traditions, the basic view is that people are fundamentally good and healthy. It's as if everyone who has ever been born has the same birthright, which is enormous potential of warm heart and clear mind. The ground of renunciation is realizing that we already have exactly what we need, that what we have already is good. Every moment of time has enormous energy in it, and we could connect with that.



I was recently in a doctor's office that had a poster on the wall of an old native American woman walking along the road, holding the hand of a little child. The caption read: "The seasons come and go, summer follows spring and fall follows summer and winter follows fall, and human beings are born and mature, have their middle age, begin to grow older and die, and everything has its cycles. Day follows night, night follows day. It is good to be part of all of this."



Renunciation is realizing that our nostalgia for wanting to stay in a protected, limited, petty world is insane. Once you begin to get the feeling of how big the world is and how vast our potential for experiencing life is, then you really begin to understand renunciation. When we sit in meditation, we feel our breath as it goes out, and we have some sense of willingness just to be open to the present moment. Then our minds wander off into all kinds of stories and fabrications and manufactured realities, and we say to ourselves, "It's thinking." We say that with a lot of gentleness and a lot of precision. Every time we are willing to let the story line go, and every time we are willing to let go at the end of the out breath, that's fundamental renunciation: learning how to let go of holding on and holding back.



The river flows rapidly down the mountain, and then all of a sudden it gets blocked with big boulders and a lot of trees. The water can't go any further, even though it has tremendous force and forward energy. It just gets blocked there. That's what happens with us, too; we get blocked like that. Letting go at the end of the out-breath, letting the thoughts go, is like moving one of those boulders away so that the water can keep flowing, so that our energy and our life force can keep evolving and going forward. We don't, out of fear of the unknown, have to put up these blocks, these dams, that basically say no to life and to feeling life.



So renunciation is seeing clearly how we hold back, how we pull away, how we shut down, how we close off, and then learning how to open. It's about saying yes to whatever is put on your plate, whatever knocks on your door, whatever calls you up on your telephone. How we actually do that has to do with coming up against our edge, which is actually the moment when we learn what renunciation means. There is a story about a group of people climbing to the top of a mountain. It turns out it's pretty steep, and as soon as they get up to a certain height, a couple of people look down and see how far it is, and completely freeze; they had come up against their edge and they couldn't go beyond it. Their fear was so great, they couldn't move. Other people tripped on ahead, laughing and talking, but as the climb got steeper and more scary, more people began to get scared and freeze. All the way up this mountain there were places where people met their edge and just froze and couldn't go any further. The moral of the story is that it really doesn't make any difference where you meet your edge; just meeting it is the point. Life is a whole journey of meeting your edge again and again. That's where you're challenged; that's where, if you're a person who wants to live, you start to ask yourself questions like, "Now, why am I so scared? What is it that I don't want to see? Why can't I go any further than this?" The happy people who got to the top were not the heroes of the day. They just weren't afraid of heights; they are going to meet their edge somewhere else. The ones who froze at the bottom were not the losers. They simply stopped first and so their lesson came earlier than the others. However, sooner or later, everybody meets his or her own edge.







When we meditate, we're creating a situation in which there's a lot of space. That sounds good but actually it can be unnerving, because when there's a lot of space you can see very clearly: you've removed your veils, your shields, your armor, your dark glasses, your earplugs, your layers of mittens, your heavy boots. Finally you're standing, touching the earth, feeling the sun on your body, feeling its brightness, hearing all the noises without anything to dull the sound. You take off your nose plug, and maybe you're going to smell lovely fresh air or maybe you're in the middle of a garbage dump. Since meditation has this quality of bringing you very close to yourself and your experience, you tend to come up against your edge faster. It's not an edge that wasn't there before, but because things are so simplified and clear, you see it, and you see it vividly and clearly.



How do we renounce? How do we work with this tendency to block and to freeze and to refuse to take another step toward the unknown? If our edge is like a huge stone wall with a door in it, how do we learn to open the door and step through it again and again, so that life becomes a process of growing up, becoming more and more fearless and flexible, more and more able to play like a raven in the wind?



THE ANIMALS AND the plants here on Cape Breton are hardy and fearless and playful and joyful. The wilder the weather is, the more the ravens love it. They have the time of their lives in the winter, when the wind gets much stronger and there's lots of ice and snow. They challenge the wind. They get up on the tops of the trees and hold on with their claws and then they grab on with their beaks as well. At some point they just let go into the wind and let it blow them away. Then they play on it, float in it. After a while, they'll go back to the tree and start over. It's a game. Once I saw them in an incredible hurricane-velocity wind, grabbing each other's feet and dropping and then letting go and flying out. It was like a circus act. They have had to develop a zest for challenge and for life. As you can see, it adds up to tremendous beauty and inspiration. The same goes for us.



Whenever you realize you have met your edge, rather than think, "I have made a mistake," you can acknowledge the present moment and its teaching. You can hear the message, which is simply that you're saying, "No." The instruction is to soften, to connect with your heart and engender a basic attitude of generosity and compassion toward yourself.



The journey of awakening—the classical journey of the mythical hero or heroine—is one of continually coming up against big challenges and then learning how to soften and open. In other words, the paralyzed quality seems to be hardening and refusing, and the letting go or the renunciation of that attitude is simply feeling the whole thing in your heart, letting it touch your heart. You soften and feel compassion for your predicament and for the whole human condition. You soften so that you can actually sit there with those troubling feelings and let them soften you more.



The whole journey of renunciation, or starting to say yes to life, is realizing first of all that you've come up against your edge, that everything in you is saying no, and then at that point, softening. This is yet another opportunity to develop loving-kindness for yourself, which results in playfulness—learning to play like a raven in the wind.





Photo by Lynn Davis.

One Of Eight Billion

From The American Spectator:

Ben Stein's Diary


One of Eight Billion

By Ben Stein from the November 2010 issue



Sunday



"Feelings come and feelings go. And feelings are not facts."



These were words I heard in one of the first 12-step meetings I ever went to. It was at noon Monday through Saturday in a disused junior high school in Point Dume, Malibu. The meeting was called "Spiritual Search," after one of the 12 steps of the program, actually the eleventh step. I went to that first meeting about 23 years ago. They stunned me with their insightfulness then and now.



Those words have saved me from suicide many a time. In that same room I also heard the saying, "What happens to me is not very important. I am one of eight billion or so people on the planet and what happens to me is not terribly important."



These thoughts and many other great 12-step thoughts are coming in handy today as I contemplate some mean comments made about me on TV. Here is what happened.



As you all know, I have parted from contemporary GOP orthodoxy innumerable times by calling for higher taxes on the genuinely rich, such as persons making more than $5 million per annum. This has gotten me gentle criticism by the supply-siders, but all within the bounds of decency.



However, I cannot countenance raising taxes in the midst of a severe downturn. Yes, we may have reached the trough, but we still have a long way to go to get back to where we were three years ago. So, why raise taxes? The Obama administration is explicitly for large scale deficit spending in good times and bad, so why raise taxes on anyone and counter the Keynesian deficit spending effect, if there is one? The stated reason is that the rich do not spend much of what they earn, but that's a laugh riot. The rich spend every cent they earn as far as I can tell, except for the very top of the heap. The great Milton Friedman found that the marginal propensity to consume was consistently 100 percent and if he found that, it's good enough for me.



Anyway, by general consensus, raising taxes in a slowdown is counter-stimulative, and if you don't mind deficits (à la Mr. Obama ), then why raise taxes even on the rich? Is it just to punish the rich? And if so, what have the rich done wrong to merit this punishment? They tried to be successful. They employ other people. They give to charity. When did that become a crime?



So, I gave a little, good-natured commentary on this subject on the telly. I added that when good times returned -- if they do -- probably taxes on the well-to-do should be raised.



It made Bill Maher angry, but then he's a difficult case always. So, I didn't worry much about that. Anyway, he's on HBO, which is a network I don't watch.



But then this morning, a network with which I have an extremely close connection ran a piece about what a lump of dirt I am, how elitist and unpatriotic and greedy, for not wanting my taxes raised in a recession. It was spoken by an angry woman whom I don't know, but who works for the Syfy Channel.



"Upset" is far too mild a word to describe how I felt. First, as I tell my readers endlessly, I am NOT rich. I make a good living, but I am not rich. Second, I give away to the less fortunate a truly insanely large part of what I do earn, and I am taxed to death on the rest. Third, while there are millions who are more patriotic than I am, a small bit of research would show I was at least above average in patriotism. Besides, I do not equate patriotism with having my taxes jacked up to pay off public employee unions.



Anyway, I was really upset.



But luckily, I got a lot of supportive mail, and that helped me. Plus, I lay in bed with my Brigid, my rapidly aging German short-haired pointer, and that helped. Finally, I went out and got a huge milkshake and wolfed it down, and that helped a lot.



I also heard in those 12-step rooms long ago that "enemies are often our best teachers..." I have no idea of who that woman is or why she took such a personal tack on a public policy issue. But she did ruin my morning without adding one iota to the debate on fiscal policy. From this, I will try to learn that words can wound, and that I should use them more carefully and more diplomatically, even when provoked. We have been given a great lesson in this world:



Bless them that curse you.


Pray for them that despitefully use you.

Love them that hate you.



So, last night I prayed for that woman from the Syfy Channel, and I sincerely hope it helps her if she needs help or even if it doesn't. I am a total mess as a moral being, but I am always trying to learn.



Monday



A FASCINATING EVENING on Larry King Live talking about the collapse of public education. I kept asking the other guests why, why, why has the school system fallen so badly. No one could answer. To my mind, it has a lot to do with a culture that does not value learning, and this culture has swept the nation, from the inner city to the suburbs and back again. This culture says it's cool to sing and be on Dancing With the Stars, but pays little heed or value to knowing much.



The tragedy is that this attitude results in uneducated young people who drop out of school, take to crime, do not know how to do a day's work, and just drag down their families, their communities, the nation, and themselves.



This condition -- not wanting to learn or even knowing how to learn -- is going to kill this country, or at least the idea of a fluid, meritocratic society. The poor will stay poor and the rich who are willing to learn will stay rich.



This will eventually drag down national productivity to the point where we truly become a Third World nation with a thin slice of first world on top of. The process will take a long time, but it will happen. It is already happening.



Thursday



OFF TO AUSTIN to speak to a group of people connected with a powerful hedge fund called Whitebox; one of the founders is a math whiz named Andrew Greenleaf and another is an all around genius named Richard Vigilante, who used to toil here at The American Spectator. They were a great, smart group. Many of them do what is called "arbitrage" with convertible bonds. I got a sort of a twinge when I met them. I wrote a paper on convertible arbitrage for Professor Henry Wallich -- or was it James Tobin -- at the Yale graduate school of economics back in 1969. That is 41 years ago, and I see the field is still going strong.



My pal Phil DeMuth, whom I brought to the conference because he is so interested in investing, told me that if I had been born 25 years later, I would have been a hedge fund guy and a billionaire. I don't think so. I like the performer's life as well as economics and law and writing. I could never do just one.



Friday



WOW. I had to get up at 5 a.m. PDT to do my speech. I did it and it went well, but I was very tired by the time I got to the Austin airport. Phil kindly bought me a chocolate milkshake but it was off somehow and I got quite sick on the plane. No fun.



I got home, rested with the dogs (pure bliss), then drove down to San Diego to give another speech to investors. I am like a dog. I love to get into the back of a car and go right to sleep. I wonder if someone could make a device that simulated being driven in a car. I know that puts crying babies to sleep as well. General Electric, get to it.



I got to my hotel, had a leisurely but very light meal with Joe Lucia, and then headed to bed. As I unpacked, I saw on TV that Rick Sanchez had been fired from CNN for making allegedly anti-Semitic remarks.



I listened to some of them online. Mr. Sanchez is a dangerously angry guy. That has thrown me about him from day one. Looks like he's just spoiling for a fight at any time. But his remarks, while highly inflammatory, were nothing like as anti-Semitic as the e-mails I am endlessly getting. Still, probably good for Mr. Sanchez to have a rest. We all need to rest and maybe then after his rest, Mr. Sanchez can come back to MSNBC, where extreme anger is possibly more highly prized.



I fell asleep just lying in my bed thinking about how quiet it was at the hotel and how grateful I am for the quiet. I guess I am really getting old. I consider a quiet room just about the ultimate luxury.




Friday



A SPEECH, then a glorious light lunch (scrambled eggs and toast) under a palm tree facing Mission Bay. No one deserves anything this good, and the breeze off the bay makes it perfect. Thank you, Ray Lucia, for making it possible.



I spent all of the lunch urging a young woman who is fighting with her husband to forgive him and get back together. "He's the kids' father," I said, "and what better use do you have for your time than to forgive?" 



Letter to the Editor



Ben Stein is a writer, actor, economist, and lawyer living in Beverly Hills and Malibu. He writes "Ben Stein's Diary" for every issue of The American Spectator.

There Is No Hiding

From The Christian Reader:

There is No Hiding


Arise, O LORD; O God, lift up thine hand: forget not the humble. Wherefore doth the wicked contemn God? he hath said in his heart, Thou wilt not require it. Thou hast seen it; for thou beholdest mischief and spite, to requite it with thy hand: the poor committeth himself unto thee; thou art the helper of the fatherless. Break thou the arm of the wicked and the evil man: seek out his wickedness till thou find none. The LORD is King for ever and ever: the heathen are perished out of his land. LORD, thou hast heard the desire of the humble: thou wilt prepare their heart, thou wilt cause thine ear to hear: To judge the fatherless and the oppressed, that the man of the earth may no more oppress. (Psalm 10:12-18)



With what bold language will faith address its God! and yet what unbelief is mingled with our strongest confidence. Fearlessly the Lord is stirred up to arise and lift up his hand, yet timidly he is begged not to forget the humble; as if Jehovah could ever be forgetful of his saints. This verse is the incessant cry of the Church, and she will never refrain therefrom until her Lord shall come in his glory to avenge her of all her adversaries.



Verse 13. In these verses the description of the wicked is condensed, and the evil of his character traced to its source, viz., atheistical ideas with regard to the government of the world. We may at once perceive that this is intended to be another urgent plea with the Lord to show his power, and reveal his justice. When the wicked call God’s righteousness in question, we may well beg him to teach them terrible things in righteousness. In verse 13, the hope of the infidel and his heart-wishes are laid bare. He despises the Lord, because he will not believe that sin will meet with punishment: “he hath said in his heart, Thou wilt not require it.” If there were no hell for other men, there ought to be one for those who question the justice of it.



Verse 14. This vile suggestion receives its answer in verse 14. “Thou hast seen it; for thou beholdest mischief and spite, to requite it with thy hand.” God is all-eye to see, and all-hand to punish his enemies. From Divine oversight there is no hiding, and from Divine justice there is no fleeing. Wanton mischief shall meet with woeful misery, and those who harbour spite shall inherit sorrow. Verily there is a God which judgeth in the earth. Nor is this the only instance of the presence of God in the world; for while he chastises the oppressor, he befriends the oppressed. “The poor committeth himself unto thee.” They give themselves up entirely into the Lord’s hands. Resigning their judgment to his enlightenment, and their wills to his supremacy, they rest assured that he will order all things for the best. Nor does he deceive their hope. He preserves them in times of need, and causes them to rejoice in his goodness. “Thou art the helper of the fatherless.” God is the parent of all orphans. When the earthly father sleeps beneath the sod, a heavenly Father smiles from above. By some means or other, orphan children are fed, and well they may when they have such a Father.







Get "Treasury of David" from the bookstore

Verse 15. In this verse we hear again the burden of the psalmist’s prayer: “Break thou the arm of the wicked and the evil man.” Let the sinner lose his power to sin; stop the tyrant, arrest the oppressor, weaken the loins of the mighty, and dash in pieces the terrible. They deny thy justice: let them feel it to the full. Indeed, they shall feel it; for God shall hunt the sinner for ever: so long as there is a grain of sin in him it shall be sought out and punished. It is not a little worthy of note, that very few great persecutors have ever died in their beds: the curse has manifestly pursued them, and their fearful sufferings have made them own that divine justice at which they could at one time launch defiance. God permits tyrants to arise as thorn-hedges to protect his church from the intrusion of hypocrites, and that he may teach his backsliding children by them, as Gideon did the men of Succoth with the briers of the wilderness; but he soon cuts up these Herods, like the thorns, and casts them into the fire. Thales, the Milesian, one of the wise men of Greece, being asked what he thought to be the greatest rarity in the world, replied, “To see a tyrant live to be an old man.” See how the Lord breaks, not only the arm, but the neck of proud oppressors! To the men who had neither justice nor mercy for the saints, there shall be rendered justice to the full, but not a grain of mercy.



Verses 16, 17, 18. The Psalm ends with a song of thanksgiving to the great and everlasting King, because he has granted the desire of his humble and oppressed people, has defended the fatherless, and punished the heathen who trampled upon his poor and afflicted children. Let us learn that we are sure to speed well, if we carry our complaint to the King of kings. Rights will be vindicated, and wrongs redressed, at his throne. His government neglects not the interests of the needy, nor does it tolerate oppression in the mighty. Great God, we leave ourselves in thine hand; to thee we commit thy church afresh. Arise, O God, and let the man of the earth—the creature of a day—be broken before the majesty of thy power. Come, Lord Jesus, and glorify thy people. Amen and Amen.



by Charles Spurgeon, from The Treasury of David





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An Inescapable Principle

From The Christian Reader:

An Inescapable Principle


by Brian Carpenter



We begin our meditations today on the Fifth Commandment, but before we do, it’s worth noting that we are at a transition point. The Westminster Larger Catechism reads as follows:



Q. 122. What is the sum of the six commandments which contain our duty to man?

A. The sum of the six commandments which contain our duty to man, is, to love our neighbor as ourselves, and to do to others what we would have them do to us.



The first four commandments are also called the First Table of the Law. Those four commandments teach us what it means to love the Lord our God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength. If we love God we will worship, adore, and obey Him alone. We will worship Him in the correct manner. We will take care to respect his Name and all whereby He makes Himself known. We will set His day aside for worship and rest in Him.



The next six commandments are the Second Table of the Law. These six commandments teach us what it means to love our neighbor as ourselves.



The Fifth Commandment is, on the face of it, a commandment regulating the relations between parents and children. But remember that each of the commandments is a synechdoche. It stands for more than it actually says. Fundamentally this commandment is about human relations within the God-ordained hierarchy in which we all exist whether or not we particularly believe that we do or particularly like it. I personally believe that the Lord chose the parent-child relationship as the paradigm for this commandment because it is the most naturally and obviously hierarchical, and it is most naturally and obviously good that it be so. Of course postmodern western man has managed to severely damage and disrupt even this most self-evident truth. This is because the Devil thoroughly controls the opinion-making centers of western culture and is very good at getting fallen men to profess to be wise at the same time they are being exceedingly foolish.



Every parent of a young child understands that there must be a significant amount of control exerted over the child’s affairs, and that this is in the best interests of the child. They come to us as tiny, utterly self-centered barbarians. Children need to be taught right from wrong. They need to be kept safe. They need to be taught to control their impulses. They need to be formed and shaped according to our social and cultural norms so that they can get along in the society in which we live. The Christian knows that the child must also be taught the things of the Lord. The wise Christian knows that it is the duty of the parents, and particularly the father, to train up a child in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. The Lord has ordained that this be so. He has laid this upon the parents as a sacred duty.



This, by the way, has become one of my hobby horses. Christian families have, by and large, outsourced the Christian education of their children. It has been relegated to the Sunday School teacher and the Youth Minister. This is totally inadequate. It is also simply disobedience to the clear commandment of scripture. The Lord lays the responsibility for the spiritual education of the children squarely on the parents:



“Now this is the commandment, and these are the statutes and judgments which the LORD your God has commanded to teach you, that you may observe them in the land which you are crossing over to possess, that you may fear the LORD your God, to keep all His statutes and His commandments which I command you, you and your son and your grandson, all the days of your life, and that your days may be prolonged. Therefore hear, O Israel, and be careful to observe it, that it may be well with you, and that you may multiply greatly as the LORD God of your fathers has promised you—‘a land flowing with milk and honey.’



“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one! You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength.



“And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates. (Deut 6:1-9)





And:





‘And it shall be that if you earnestly obey My commandments which I command you today, to love the LORD your God and serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul, then I will giveyou the rain for your land in its season, the early rain and the latter rain, that you may gather in your grain, your new wine, and your oil. And I will send grass in your fields for your livestock, that you may eat and be filled.’ Take heed to yourselves, lest your heart be deceived, and you turn aside and serve other gods and worship them, lest the LORD’s anger be aroused against you, and He shut up the heavens so that there be no rain, and the land yield no produce, and you perish quickly from the good land which the LORD is giving you.



“Therefore you shall lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall teach them to your children, speaking of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up. And you shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates, that your days and the days of your children may be multiplied in the land of which the LORD swore to your fathers to give them, like the days of the heavens above the earth. (Deut 11:13-21)





My concerns with outsourcing the child’s spiritual education to the church are twofold. First of all there is the effect of time spent. Your youth director and Sunday school teacher have access to your kids for two or three hours per week at best. But if your children go to public school and their best friends are worldlings, they are being influenced by those forces for 40 or 50 hours per week. Which is going to have more influence on them, naturally speaking? The world will. And since the Devil is the God of this world, let’s be frank and say that the Devil will be their primary influence.



Second of all, while I admit that there are certainly godly Sunday School teachers who take their job very seriously and see it as a calling, it is my experience that this is not the norm any longer. As a pastor I can tell you that it can be a tremendous headache to try and fill slots for Sunday School classes. People often have to be dragged to it, have to be spoonfed materials (which are often of marginal theological quality and that they hardly look at) are slightly resentful and halfhearted while they serve, and won’t continue in the harness for very long. Every pastor longs to have a group of Sunday School teachers who love God and love teaching children about God. Most pastors can’t say that.



Youth ministers are also problematic in my experience. Once again, I do not deny that there are very good youth ministers out there. But in my experience the task of youth ministry usually goes to the nitwit with the least theological grounding and the coolest hair. If he can play the guitar, so much the better. The time spent in youth group is more about games, eating, and socializing. Then they will get a fifteen minute “message” which usually comes from some very psychologized, pop-theology-centered book and is of very dubious spiritual value. Three or four times a year there should be some sort of retreat or lock-in because of the firm belief in the inherent spiritual value of fun, fatigue, and unsupervised sexual experimentation in the middle of the night. Maybe once or twice a year there should be a service project where the kids work (badly) on the yard of some widow or stand around the grounds of a Habitat home holding a loaded paintbrush or roller and horsing around with their friends. If they are really lucky, a whole parallel “worship service” will be set up for the kids, thus relieving them of the need to ever hear a sermon from the senior pastor, sing a song that’s been around for more than ten years, or get to know someone over the age of 25.



The idea that the youth minister would teach the kids the Bible is sort of weird. And if he tried to teach them the Catechism and Confessions he would probably be fired before long. If the Sesame Street theology and Pizza-For-Jesus methodology were abandoned, the unconverted and perpetually spiritually immature kids would stop coming. The parents, who are unconverted or perpetually spiritually immature themselves and thus are doing absolutely nothing spiritual in their homes would grow alarmed that their kids didn’t “like church” anymore. They would demand to know why their money was going to pay for a youth minister who their kids didn’t like. Since the Senior Pastor didn’t become a Senior Pastor to preside over a shrinking church, it wouldn’t be long before said youth minister was replaced with someone who had cooler hair, a guitar, and no firm theological knowledge or convictions. Of course, when the kids go off to college or into the military, they abandon the church altogether because they’ve never really been part of the church to begin with.



Recently, however, the church has moved to address this. Thanks to the groundwork laid by the Seeker Sensitive movement in the 1990’s and the innovations of the Emergent Church movement, they can now go to the latest emergent-type church where they can have a more grownup version of the Sesame Street theology and the Pizza-for-Jesus methodology. And they can be taught to call what they are doing “real” and “raw” and “authentic” and pretend that their newly discovered spirituality isn’t about rules (so they can still fornicate freely without feeling guilty about it) but is about “relationships” and thus is really far superior to anything practiced by the Reformers or the Puritans or the great saints of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries.



If you are concerned about your child’s eternal soul, you must give them the gospel and the things of God from a very tender age. You must teach them to pray. You must teach them the scriptures. You must catechize them. You must teach them the hymns and songs of the faith. You must have family worship. You must talk to them about their hearts and how Jesus loves a beautiful heart and how He can turn the ugly heart they were born with into a beautiful heart. You must show them that you, too, are one under authority, who must obey God. You must do so cheerfully, purposely, and openly. You must show them by example how the Christian life is lived. Which means you actually have to live it. Which means you must put aside the idolatry to your golf game, your fishing hobby, your shopping habit, or your real estate career in order to be present to your children and instruct them. You must repent of your worldliness and learn to love Jesus and serve Him with your whole heart first. For you cannot give away what you do not possess yourself. By all means, begin to do so today. Right now is not a moment too soon.



Next week, if God permits, we will explore these things further.

Greek Orthodox Daily Readings For Wednesday, 1 December

From The Greek Orthodox Arch-Diocese of America:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +




Daily Scripture Readings and Lives of the Saints for Wednesday, December 1, 2010



Strict Fast



Readings for today:



St. Paul's Second Letter to Timothy 4:9-22

Luke 20:1-8



Feasts and Saints celebrated today:



Wednesday of the 11th Week

Nahum the Prophet

Philaret the Merciful of Amnia

Ananias the Persian

Holy Father Theocletus the Wonderworker, Archbishop of Lacedaemonia

Our Holy Fathers Ananius and Solochon, Archbishops of Ephesus





Epistle Reading



The reading is from St. Paul's Second Letter to Timothy 4:9-22



TIMOTHY, my son, do your best to come to me soon. For Demas, in love with

this present world, has deserted me and gone to Thessalonica; Crescens

has gone to Galatia, Titus to Dalmatia. Luke alone is with me. Get

Mark and bring him with you; for he is very useful in serving me.

Tychicos I have sent to Ephesos. When you come, bring the cloak that I

left with Carpos at Troas, also the books, and above all the

parchments. Alexander the coppersmith did me great harm; the Lord will

requite him for his deeds. Beware of him yourself, for he strongly

opposed our message. At my first defense no one took my part; all

deserted me. May it not be charged against them! But the Lord stood by me

and gave me strength to proclaim the message fully, that all the

Gentiles might hear it. So I was rescued from the lion's mouth. The Lord

will rescue me from every evil and save me for his heavenly kingdom.

To him be the glory for ever and ever. Amen.



Greet Prisca and Aquila, and the household of Onesiphoros. Erastos

remained at Corinth; Trophimos I left ill at Miletos. Do your best to come

before winter. Eubulos sends greetings to you, as do Pudens and Linos

and Claudia and all the brethren.



The Lord be with your spirit. Grace be with you. Amen.



(C) 2010 Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America



Gospel Reading



The reading is from Luke 20:1-8



At that time, as Jesus was teaching the people in the temple and

preaching the gospel, the chief priests and the scribes with the elders

came up and said to Him, "Tell us by what authority you do these

things, or who it is that gave you this authority." He answered

them, "I also will ask you a question; now tell me, was the

baptism of John from heaven or from men?" And they discussed it

with one another, saying, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he

will say, 'Why did you not believe him?' But if we say,

'From men,' all the people will stone us; for they are convinced

that John was a prophet." So they answered that they did not

know whence it was. And Jesus said to them, "Neither will I tell

you by what authority I do these things."



(C) 2010 Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America





Nahum the Prophet



Reading from the Synaxarion:



The Prophet Nahum had Elkesaeus (Elkosh) as his homeland, and was

from the tribe of Symeon; he is seventh in order among the twelve

Minor Prophets He prophesied during the time of Hezekias, after the

destruction of Samaria (721 years before Christ), but before the ten tribes

were taken into captivity; he prophesied against Nineveh, the capital

of Assyria. His name means "comforter." His book of prophecy is

divided into three chapters.



Apolytikion in the Second Tone

As we celebrate the memory of Thy Prophet Nahum, O Lord, through him

we beseech Thee to save our souls.



Kontakion in the Fourth Tone

Thy pure heart, illumined by the Holy Spirit, was a sacred vessel of

resplendent prophecy, for thou didst see things far off as close at hand.

Hence we revere thee, blest Nahum most glorious.



Reading courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Monastery

Apolytikion courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Monastery

Kontakion courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Monastery





Philaret the Merciful of Amnia



Reading from the Synaxarion:



Saint Philaret a native of Paphlagonia in Asia Minor, was a virtuous

Christian layman who lived in lawful wedlock and raised a family. He was

most renowned for his generosity to all in need. With the permission

of God, in a short space of time he lost the greater part of his

possessions to theft and other misfortunes and was left with nothing but his

family, his home, and a little livestock. Yet he continued to give

generously to the poor despite the faint-heartedness of his family, who

reproached him for giving alms when they were in need themselves; and God,

seeing his faith, restored his prosperity to him many times over. He

foresaw the day of his death, and reposed in an odour of sanctity in

Constantinople in 789.



Apolytikion in the Third Tone

From the inner wealth of a divine faith, thou didst deal thy riches to

the needy; and thy works of compassion have glorified Christ, the

Bestower of mercy, O Philaret; for thy whole life was adorned with a love

like His. Intercede for us, O Almsgiver, that He richly grant great

mercy and compassion unto us, the poor.



Kontakion in the Plagal of the Fourth Tone

In all temptations, thou hadst Job's courageous manliness, and in

thy mercy thou didst give thy riches to the poor, being truly a

living fountain of almsgiving. By the holy way of life that thou hast

shown to us, thou dost also gladden all that cry to thee with love:

Rejoice, O Philaret, faithful servant of Christ our God.



Reading courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Monastery

Apolytikion courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Monastery

Kontakion courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Monastery